|
MedChemExpress
tak 779 ![]() Tak 779, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/tak+779/TAK-779/pmc10175017-33-3-7 Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tak 779 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
TargetMol
tak 779 ![]() Tak 779, supplied by TargetMol, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/tak+779/TAK-779/pmc13428328-118-15-19 Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tak 779 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Tocris
tak 779 ![]() Tak 779, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/tak+779/TAK+779/pm42814571-737-0-1 Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tak 779 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Verlag GmbH
tak-779 ![]() Tak 779, supplied by Verlag GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/tak+779/tak+779/10__1002_slash_chin__201492401-941-34-13 Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tak-779 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Takeda
tak ![]() Tak, supplied by Takeda, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/tak+779/779+tak/pm16319100-43-0-4 Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tak - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
TAK-779 (Takeda 779) is a potent and selective nonpeptide antagonist of CCR5 with Ki of 1.1 nM. TAK-779 is also a CXCR3 antagonist and an effective, selective inhibitor of R5 HIV-1 with EC50 and EC90
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
TAK-779 is an antagonist of chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), CCR2b, and CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3).
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
TAK-779 is a potent, dual antagonist at chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR5 with IC50 = 1.4 nM at CCR5 and 2.3 nM at CCR2. Antagonists of both CCR2 and CCR5 such as TAK-779 have been
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
TAK 779 is an antagonist of chemokine receptor 5 CCR5 CCR2b and CXC chemokine receptor 3 CXCR3 It inhibits CCR5 and CXCR3 ICs 236 and 369 nM respectively for mouse recombinant receptors expressed in 2B4
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
TAK-779(Cat No.:I002746)is a potent, selective antagonist of the CCR5 chemokine receptor, known for its role in blocking HIV entry into host cells. By inhibiting the binding of the virus to CCR5, a key co-receptor for
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: Journal of Oncology
Article Title: Palbociclib Enhances Migration and Invasion of Cancer Cells via Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype-Related CCL5 in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
doi: 10.1155/2022/2260625
Figure Lengend Snippet: Blocking SASP-related CCL5 inhibits the migration ability induced by Palbociclib. (a) The effect of antagonists of CCR5 TAK-779 on the migration ability of NSCLC cells treated with 2 μ M Palbociclib. Upper: Images of migrated cell with Palbociclib or TAK-779, bar: 100 μ m. Lower: The results were analyzed using unpaired t -test. (b) Diagram showing how Palbociclib contributes to the migration and invasion of NSCLC via SASP-related CCL5.
Article Snippet: Antagonists of CCR5,
Techniques: Blocking Assay, Migration
Journal: Genes to Cells
Article Title: Treatment With Ruxolitinib and TAK ‐779 Enhances GII .17 Human Norovirus Replication and Enables Serial Passaging in Human Intestinal Enteroids
doi: 10.1111/gtc.70139
Figure Lengend Snippet: Treatment with ruxolitinib and TAK‐779 enhances GII.17 replication in HIEs. J2 monolayers were pretreated with ruxolitinib (5 μM) and/or TAK‐779 (30 μM) for 3 h and then inoculated with a stool filtrate containing GII.17 (1.6 × 10 5 GEs/well) in a differentiation medium supplemented with the corresponding compounds and 500 μM GCDCA for 1 h at 37°C. After washing, the cells were cultured with the specified compounds and GCDCA. The cells and culture supernatants were collected at 24, 48, and 96 hpi, and viral RNA was quantified by RT‐qPCR. Differentiation medium containing DMSO and 500 μM GCDCA served as the vehicle control. Data are presented as the mean ± SD ( n ≥ 5). Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Steel's multiple‐comparison test. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with DMSO‐treated controls at each time point (* p < 0.05). ns, not significant; hpi, h postinfection.
Article Snippet: Briefly, J2 monolayers were pretreated with either ruxolitinib (5 μM; T1829, TargetMol, Boston, MA, USA),
Techniques: Cell Culture, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Comparison
Journal: Genes to Cells
Article Title: Treatment With Ruxolitinib and TAK ‐779 Enhances GII .17 Human Norovirus Replication and Enables Serial Passaging in Human Intestinal Enteroids
doi: 10.1111/gtc.70139
Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of ruxolitinib and TAK‐779 on GII.3 and GII.4 HuNoV replication in HIEs. J2 monolayers pretreated with ruxolitinib (5 μM) and/or TAK‐779 (30 μM) were infected with stool filtrate containing GII.3 (4.3 × 10 5 GEs/well) (a) or GII.4 (1.1 × 10 7 GEs/well) (b), as shown in Figure . At 48 hpi, the cells and culture supernatants were collected, and viral RNA was quantified by RT‐qPCR. Data are presented as the mean ± SD ( n ≥ 9). Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Steel's multiple‐comparison test. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with DMSO‐treated controls (** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001). hpi, h postinfection.
Article Snippet: Briefly, J2 monolayers were pretreated with either ruxolitinib (5 μM; T1829, TargetMol, Boston, MA, USA),
Techniques: Infection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Comparison
Journal: Genes to Cells
Article Title: Treatment With Ruxolitinib and TAK ‐779 Enhances GII .17 Human Norovirus Replication and Enables Serial Passaging in Human Intestinal Enteroids
doi: 10.1111/gtc.70139
Figure Lengend Snippet: Treatment with ruxolitinib and TAK‐779 enables serial passaging of GII.17, and passaged viruses exhibit higher viral RNA copies than stool‐derived viruses in HIEs. (a) J2 monolayers pretreated with ruxolitinib (5 μM) and TAK‐779 (30 μM) were infected with stool filtrate containing GII.17 (1.6 × 10 5 GEs/well) in a differentiation medium supplemented with the specified compounds and GCDCA for 3 h at 37°C. At 96 hpi, the cells were harvested, sonicated, and centrifuged. A portion of the clarified supernatants was used for RT‐qPCR quantification of viral RNA. For serial passaging, the virus was used to inoculate newly prepared J2 monolayers under the same conditions for up to five passages. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n ≥ 5). (b) J2 monolayers were inoculated with 4.6 × 10 4 GEs per well of stool‐derived GII.17 or P5 virus stock in differentiation medium supplemented with GCDCA for 1 h at 37°C. Following infection, cells and culture supernatants were collected at 48 hpi, and viral RNA was quantified by RT‐qPCR. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 4). Statistical significance was assessed using the Welch t ‐test. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with stool‐derived infection at 48 hpi (* p < 0.05). hpi, h postinfection.
Article Snippet: Briefly, J2 monolayers were pretreated with either ruxolitinib (5 μM; T1829, TargetMol, Boston, MA, USA),
Techniques: Passaging, Derivative Assay, Infection, Sonication, Quantitative RT-PCR, Virus
Journal: Genes to Cells
Article Title: Treatment With Ruxolitinib and TAK ‐779 Enhances GII .17 Human Norovirus Replication and Enables Serial Passaging in Human Intestinal Enteroids
doi: 10.1111/gtc.70139
Figure Lengend Snippet: Detection of GII.17 VP1 in HIEs by immunofluorescence. J2 monolayers pretreated with DMSO (a) or ruxolitinib (5 μM) and TAK‐779 (30 μM) (b) were infected with mock inoculum (left panels), stool filtrate containing GII.17 (middle panels), or P4 virus stock (right panels) in the presence of DMSO or specified compounds and GCDCA. At 96 hpi, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 1% Triton X‐100. GII.17‐positive cells were detected using GII.17‐specific antiserum (green) and stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 100 μm. DAPI, 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole; VP1, viral protein 1.
Article Snippet: Briefly, J2 monolayers were pretreated with either ruxolitinib (5 μM; T1829, TargetMol, Boston, MA, USA),
Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Infection, Virus, Staining